Panel Member:

Team Name:

Organization and Presentation of Facts

• Were the essential facts of the case organized in a clear, understandable

manner?

• Did the presenters have a good understanding of the issues?
• Did the visual presentation effectively support the oral presentation?
• Were the presenters persuasive?

o Refrained from extensive recap of case

o Captured judges’ attention in first few minutes

o Came across as credible

o PowerPoint was clear, readable, appealing, creative, and incorporated

in presentation smoothly

o Presentation logically organized

o Smooth transitions between sections

o Recommendations were summarized in a persuasive conclusion

_________ / 20 pts.

Creative and Workable Solutions

• Were good, workable solutions presented?
• Did the presenters think “outside the box”?
• Did presenters look to outside sources for additional information?
• Did the team identify a viable strategy that will address the needs

of identified stakeholders?

• Does the financial analysis clearly demonstrate the viability of the

recommendations? Is the revenue and expense structure realistic?

o Solutions were realistic and implementable and demonstrated

understanding of current Mizzou environment and resource

constraints

o Legally feasible

o Demonstrated long-range/forward thinking

o Noted best practices – where has the strategy worked successfully

o Showed support for recommendations

_________ / 20 pts